Comments for Enterra Technical Articles and Reviews http://techzone.enterra-inc.com Enterra Inc technical blog Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:32:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 Comment on Free Flash Video FLV Player by Niranjan Meegammana http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/flash/free-flash-video-flv-player/#comment-409 Niranjan Meegammana Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:42:03 +0000 http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/flash/free-flash-video-flv-player/#comment-409 Hi Mikhail Pieson Your player was just integrated to our e Learning Software Thanks it took the system to a new level and possible break throgh for our project phase II Niranjan Hi
Mikhail Pieson

Your player was just integrated to our e Learning Software
Thanks it took the system to a new level and possible break throgh for our project phase II

Niranjan

]]> Comment on GWT: improving performance by Alexey Harlamov http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/gwt/gwt-improving-performance/#comment-301 Alexey Harlamov Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:24:58 +0000 http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/gwt/gwt-improving-performance/#comment-301 Rajesh, Yes you are right. This can be a possible security hole. That is why we are keen to see innerHtml rendering support from GWT compiler. When the code generation will be done by an automatically generated code, probability of XSS hole will be subtile. Rajesh,

Yes you are right. This can be a possible security hole. That is why we are keen to see innerHtml rendering support from GWT compiler. When the code generation will be done by an automatically generated code, probability of XSS hole will be subtile.

]]> Comment on GWT: improving performance by Renat Akhmerov http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/gwt/gwt-improving-performance/#comment-300 Renat Akhmerov Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:16:08 +0000 http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/gwt/gwt-improving-performance/#comment-300 Hi, Ed Thank you for your note, looks like it makes a lot of sense to do your way :) Hi, Ed

Thank you for your note, looks like it makes a lot of sense to do your way :)

]]> Comment on GWT: improving performance by Rajesh Venkatesan http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/gwt/gwt-improving-performance/#comment-299 Rajesh Venkatesan Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:55:24 +0000 http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/gwt/gwt-improving-performance/#comment-299 Hi, Seems like an interesting option. But GWT has explicitly stated that use of inner html is a potential cause of XSS atacks. Any thoughts on that? http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/web/security-for-gwt-applications Rajesh V Hi,

Seems like an interesting option. But GWT has explicitly stated that use of inner html is a potential cause of XSS atacks. Any thoughts on that?

http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/web/security-for-gwt-applications

Rajesh V

]]> Comment on GWT: improving performance by Ed http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/gwt/gwt-improving-performance/#comment-288 Ed Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:26:07 +0000 http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/gwt/gwt-improving-performance/#comment-288 Hi Renat, I was looking a bit more at your code, and I think I could be a bit more optimized by optimizing the method DOM.getElementById() usage.... Now this method will search the whole dom tree. It's better to search the tree from the parent down, which is know by forehand... (I noticed this in other gwt related projects ;) )... Hi Renat,

I was looking a bit more at your code, and I think I could be a bit more optimized by optimizing the method DOM.getElementById() usage….
Now this method will search the whole dom tree. It’s better to search the tree from the parent down, which is know by forehand… (I noticed this in other gwt related projects ;) )…

]]> Comment on GWT: improving performance by Rudolf Michael http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/gwt/gwt-improving-performance/#comment-249 Rudolf Michael Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:05:08 +0000 http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/gwt/gwt-improving-performance/#comment-249 Hello, Intresting article... We're also moving to GWT and i have been working over it since 3 months now. I totaly agree with you on the HTML segment part, we have already figured out that doing the design using pure html and css is much much faster then using the GWT Panels components. what we are doing right now is retrieving the HTML page using an HTTP Request, then every Class/HTML Page will update its HTML code by creating and setting the widgets. we have used HTMLPanel to load the html pages and then use panel.add(Widget, htmlID) to add the widgets, everytime the page has finished loading its widgets. we're adding it to the RootPanel, our RootPanel consits of one static html page where it contains html ID. the problem is that i still have some performance issues specially if a registration page has like 80 widgets to set where every widget has an http call to get its data from the server. so i will try to use DOM.setInnerHTML instead of RootPanel().get("HTMLID").add(htmlPanel); do you know which one is faster to execute? Hello,
Intresting article…
We’re also moving to GWT and i have been working over it since 3 months now. I totaly agree with you on the HTML segment part, we have already figured out that doing the design using pure html and css is much much faster then using the GWT Panels components. what we are doing right now is retrieving the HTML page using an HTTP Request, then every Class/HTML Page will update its HTML code by creating and setting the widgets. we have used HTMLPanel to load the html pages and then use panel.add(Widget, htmlID) to add the widgets, everytime the page has finished loading its widgets. we’re adding it to the RootPanel, our RootPanel consits of one static html page where it contains html ID. the problem is that i still have some performance issues specially if a registration page has like 80 widgets to set where every widget has an http call to get its data from the server. so i will try to use DOM.setInnerHTML instead of RootPanel().get(”HTMLID”).add(htmlPanel); do you know which one is faster to execute?

]]> Comment on Video for Web: storage, access, system deployment variants by admin http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/architecture/video-for-web-storage-access-system-deployment-variants/#comment-248 admin Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:43:50 +0000 http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/architecture/video-for-web-storage-access-system-deployment-variants/#comment-248 Hello, jeffsters. Thank your for your note. Actually, we didn't consider Mac solutions in this document. Maybe the next edition will include deployment variant for Leopard server. Podcast Producer, QT Broadcaster etc. are really powerful tools to be ignored. As about Quick time Streaming Server and Darwin streaming server, they are almost identically. The main difference is that QTSS is supported and DSS is not. Hello, jeffsters.

Thank your for your note. Actually, we didn’t consider Mac solutions in this document. Maybe the next edition will include deployment variant for Leopard server. Podcast Producer, QT Broadcaster etc. are really powerful tools to be ignored. As about Quick time Streaming Server and Darwin streaming server, they are almost identically. The main difference is that QTSS is supported and DSS is not.

]]> Comment on Video for Web: storage, access, system deployment variants by jeffsters http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/architecture/video-for-web-storage-access-system-deployment-variants/#comment-109 jeffsters Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:36:25 +0000 http://techzone.enterra-inc.com/architecture/video-for-web-storage-access-system-deployment-variants/#comment-109 Why did you use Darwin as your Apple example and not the Full version in Leopard Server? Like the MS Version it too requires the installation and cost of the Server software however it's still much less and has a robust suite of tools you've ignored. Why did you use Darwin as your Apple example and not the Full version in Leopard Server? Like the MS Version it too requires the installation and cost of the Server software however it’s still much less and has a robust suite of tools you’ve ignored.

]]>